Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29991 - 30000 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 29991 - 30000 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not have been fully tried when the jury was erroneously deprived of the opportunity to hear testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432639 - 2021-09-29
not have been fully tried when the jury was erroneously deprived of the opportunity to hear testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432639 - 2021-09-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the crime. See WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(a); Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 268. It noted that the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263389 - 2020-06-09
of the crime. See WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(a); Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 268. It noted that the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263389 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reports, counsel could reasonably believe a jury would not be concerned about B.E.S.’s confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102416 - 2017-09-21
reports, counsel could reasonably believe a jury would not be concerned about B.E.S.’s confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the jury found in favor of the plaintiff. Id. at 68. On appeal, the officer argued the arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89000 - 2014-09-15
and the jury found in favor of the plaintiff. Id. at 68. On appeal, the officer argued the arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89000 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
relates to Westmoreland’s postconviction filings. ¶3 A jury found Westmoreland guilty of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113298 - 2014-06-02
relates to Westmoreland’s postconviction filings. ¶3 A jury found Westmoreland guilty of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113298 - 2014-06-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
not request a jury trial, failed to subpoena a witness, failed to call Meier as a witness at the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27340 - 2014-09-15
not request a jury trial, failed to subpoena a witness, failed to call Meier as a witness at the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27340 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 944.20(1)(b). The case was tried to a jury. At the trial, the woman and the police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29018 - 2007-05-15
. Stat. § 944.20(1)(b). The case was tried to a jury. At the trial, the woman and the police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29018 - 2007-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
having to testify at trial. 4 The jury instructions for third-degree sexual assault, which stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201619 - 2017-11-07
having to testify at trial. 4 The jury instructions for third-degree sexual assault, which stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201619 - 2017-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In 2012, a jury found Simpson guilty of three crimes: the misdemeanor offense of endangering safety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04
. In 2012, a jury found Simpson guilty of three crimes: the misdemeanor offense of endangering safety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
State v. Susan J. Seim
evidence to support the jury conviction. First, the victim and a witness present at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12428 - 2017-09-21
evidence to support the jury conviction. First, the victim and a witness present at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12428 - 2017-09-21