Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29991 - 30000 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 29991 - 30000 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1, 21-22 (1968). “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a commonsense test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46582 - 2010-02-02
. 1, 21-22 (1968). “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a commonsense test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46582 - 2010-02-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After a test of Taylor’s blood drawn within three hours of the traffic stop revealed that he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450623 - 2021-11-09
. After a test of Taylor’s blood drawn within three hours of the traffic stop revealed that he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450623 - 2021-11-09
State v. Alexis C.
, 557 N.W.2d at 252 (quoted source omitted). “This is an objective test.” Ibid. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2489 - 2005-03-31
, 557 N.W.2d at 252 (quoted source omitted). “This is an objective test.” Ibid. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2489 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory C. Kirst
. The test for sufficiency of evidence is whether a reasonable trier of fact could be convinced of guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9066 - 2005-03-31
. The test for sufficiency of evidence is whether a reasonable trier of fact could be convinced of guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9066 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to withdraw a guilty plea, a reviewing court uses a two-part test with a mixed standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29775 - 2007-07-23
motion to withdraw a guilty plea, a reviewing court uses a two-part test with a mixed standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29775 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶¶29, 30. Under § 806.07(1)(h), the “extraordinary circumstances” test applies and the court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52528 - 2010-07-27
., ¶¶29, 30. Under § 806.07(1)(h), the “extraordinary circumstances” test applies and the court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52528 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
a guilty plea, a reviewing court uses a two-part test with a mixed standard of appellate review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29775 - 2014-09-15
a guilty plea, a reviewing court uses a two-part test with a mixed standard of appellate review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29775 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a door handle area. Further investigation and testing showed the presence of cocaine and heroin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237573 - 2019-03-14
in a door handle area. Further investigation and testing showed the presence of cocaine and heroin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237573 - 2019-03-14
[PDF]
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
pursuant to a motion under WIS. STAT. § 802.03(2), “is to test the legal sufficiency of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3202 - 2017-09-19
pursuant to a motion under WIS. STAT. § 802.03(2), “is to test the legal sufficiency of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
. The test for allowing withdrawal before sentencing is whether the defendant shows a fair and just reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14171 - 2014-09-15
. The test for allowing withdrawal before sentencing is whether the defendant shows a fair and just reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14171 - 2014-09-15