Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31 - 40 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
Search results 31 - 40 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
Frontsheet
totaling $11,763.47. Of that total, $3002.95 represents appellate costs. [9] Effective July 1, 2006, SCR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29854 - 2012-03-19
totaling $11,763.47. Of that total, $3002.95 represents appellate costs. [9] Effective July 1, 2006, SCR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29854 - 2012-03-19
[PDF]
Public Reprimand with Consent - Toran
intended to cover costs, Toran violated former SCR 20:1.15(b)(4), effective prior to July 1, 2016
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/toran.pdf - 2021-05-03
intended to cover costs, Toran violated former SCR 20:1.15(b)(4), effective prior to July 1, 2016
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/toran.pdf - 2021-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
would have somehow shown that the stair lift was in fact the most cost-effective option, the ALJ’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56207 - 2010-11-01
would have somehow shown that the stair lift was in fact the most cost-effective option, the ALJ’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56207 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
on safety concerns and on the basis that more cost-effective alternatives were available to meet her needs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56207 - 2014-09-15
on safety concerns and on the basis that more cost-effective alternatives were available to meet her needs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56207 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David V. Penn
and that David V. Penn pay the costs of this reinstatement proceedings totaling $6803.64; however, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16992 - 2017-09-21
and that David V. Penn pay the costs of this reinstatement proceedings totaling $6803.64; however, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16992 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rules petition 10-08 executive summary
, education and prior experience with the courts, and the complexity of the case. ii I. Cost
/supreme/docs/1008petitionexecsummary.pdf - 2011-01-26
, education and prior experience with the courts, and the complexity of the case. ii I. Cost
/supreme/docs/1008petitionexecsummary.pdf - 2011-01-26
Frontsheet
the referee's report recommending a public reprimand, together with restitution and costs. The Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49950 - 2013-12-01
the referee's report recommending a public reprimand, together with restitution and costs. The Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49950 - 2013-12-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determined at sentencing to remain in effect: “Court costs, fees, surcharges and restitution to be paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639067 - 2023-03-30
determined at sentencing to remain in effect: “Court costs, fees, surcharges and restitution to be paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639067 - 2023-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of $1003.20 in costs against him on an appeal concerning a motion for sanctions. Schapiro argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64703 - 2011-06-28
of $1003.20 in costs against him on an appeal concerning a motion for sanctions. Schapiro argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64703 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
Furnishings Unlimited, Inc. v. Department of Industry
the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund (PECFA) for costs Furnishings incurred cleaning and removing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10022 - 2017-09-19
the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund (PECFA) for costs Furnishings incurred cleaning and removing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10022 - 2017-09-19