Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31 - 40 of 4337 for bd.

COURT OF APPEALS
based on the evidence. State ex rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Bd. of Adj., 2004 WI 23, ¶14, 269
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29771 - 2007-07-23

[PDF] NOTICE
or determination in question based on the evidence. State ex rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Bd. of Adj
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29771 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Malcolm, Inc. v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
County Bd. of Adjustment, 218 Wis. 2d 396, 577 N.W.2d 813 (1998). We agree. Malcolm next argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19364 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review the Board’s decision, not the circuit court’s. Roberts v. Manitowoc County Bd. of Adjustment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80969 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s. Roberts v. Manitowoc County Bd. of Adjustment, 2006 WI App 169, ¶10, 295 Wis. 2d 522, 721 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80969 - 2012-04-17

COURT OF APPEALS
. v. Walworth Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 170 Wis. 2d 406, 415, 489 N.W.2d 631 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56175 - 2010-11-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court. Roberts v. Manitowoc Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2006 WI App 169, ¶10, 295 Wis. 2d 522, 721
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800524 - 2024-05-15

[PDF] Gregory Spinner and Marianne Giannis v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment, Inc
County Bd. of Supervisors, 178 Wis.2d 498, 511, 504 N.W.2d 621, 626 (Ct. App. 1993). Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12766 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Disposition table for September & October, 2004
County Dep’t of Social Svcs. v. Unified Bd. of 09/16/04 Grant and Iowa Counties 03-0801 Grams v
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=864 - 2017-09-20

Gregory Spinner and Marianne Giannis v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment, Inc
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12766 - 2005-03-31