Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31 - 40 of 1781 for cm.
Search results 31 - 40 of 1781 for cm.
[PDF]
WI App 35
to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1m)(cm)2 (2021-22),1 as a second and subsequent offense. On appeal, West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795024 - 2024-09-10
to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1m)(cm)2 (2021-22),1 as a second and subsequent offense. On appeal, West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795024 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees
as the Unions) interpreting Wis. Stat. § 111.70(4)(cm)6.a.(1995-96) in No. 96-2816 2 the manner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17161 - 2017-09-21
as the Unions) interpreting Wis. Stat. § 111.70(4)(cm)6.a.(1995-96) in No. 96-2816 2 the manner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17161 - 2017-09-21
Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees
referred to collectively as the Unions) interpreting Wis. Stat. § 111.70(4)(cm)6.a.(1995-96) in the manner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17161 - 2005-03-31
referred to collectively as the Unions) interpreting Wis. Stat. § 111.70(4)(cm)6.a.(1995-96) in the manner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Racine Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
possible cost to the municipal employer.” See § 111.70(4)(cm)8p. Because WERC’s interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15291 - 2017-09-21
possible cost to the municipal employer.” See § 111.70(4)(cm)8p. Because WERC’s interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15291 - 2017-09-21
Racine Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
to “the minimum possible cost to the municipal employer.” See § 111.70(4)(cm)8p. Because WERC’s interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15291 - 2005-03-31
to “the minimum possible cost to the municipal employer.” See § 111.70(4)(cm)8p. Because WERC’s interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15291 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sokaogon Gaming Enterprise Corporation v. Lynn Danette Curda-Derickson
that the restitution order is Richard’s sole obligation pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 766.55(2)(cm) (2001-02).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5122 - 2017-09-19
that the restitution order is Richard’s sole obligation pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 766.55(2)(cm) (2001-02).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5122 - 2017-09-19
Sokaogon Gaming Enterprise Corporation v. Lynn Danette Curda-Derickson
. § 766.55(2)(cm) (2001-02).[1] BACKGROUND ¶2 Lynn Curda and Richard Derickson were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5122 - 2005-03-31
. § 766.55(2)(cm) (2001-02).[1] BACKGROUND ¶2 Lynn Curda and Richard Derickson were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tommie L. Cole
the defendant committed the crime, and Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(cm)3. provided that a person convicted "shall
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16603 - 2017-09-21
the defendant committed the crime, and Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(cm)3. provided that a person convicted "shall
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16603 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tommie L. Cole
felony at the time the defendant committed the crime, and Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(cm)3. provided
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16603 - 2005-03-31
felony at the time the defendant committed the crime, and Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(cm)3. provided
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16603 - 2005-03-31
State v. Duke M. Jawara
. Appeal No. 02-2631-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CM-3297 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5724 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 02-2631-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CM-3297 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5724 - 2005-03-31