Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31 - 40 of 42164 for samuel c. Gillen obit.
Search results 31 - 40 of 42164 for samuel c. Gillen obit.
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: c. william foust, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: c. william foust, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
County: C. WILLIAM FOUST, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Jeffrey J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
County: C. WILLIAM FOUST, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Jeffrey J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
Mark Vidal and Jerome Tork v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
evidence such that the order of March 5, 1999 was set aside pursuant to § 102.18(4)(c) Stats." Second
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16457 - 2005-03-31
evidence such that the order of March 5, 1999 was set aside pursuant to § 102.18(4)(c) Stats." Second
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16457 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark Vidal and Jerome Tork v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
This statute states in relevant part: 102.18 Findings, orders and awards. . . . . (4)(c) On its own
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16457 - 2017-09-21
This statute states in relevant part: 102.18 Findings, orders and awards. . . . . (4)(c) On its own
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16457 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 196
the notice of claim requirement of Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1) does not apply. See Gillen v. City of Neenah, 219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29561 - 2007-08-27
the notice of claim requirement of Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1) does not apply. See Gillen v. City of Neenah, 219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29561 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
WI APP 196
of claim requirement of WIS. STAT. § 893.80(1) does not apply. See Gillen v. City of Neenah, 219 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29561 - 2014-09-15
of claim requirement of WIS. STAT. § 893.80(1) does not apply. See Gillen v. City of Neenah, 219 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29561 - 2014-09-15
Mid-Plains, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
constitutional argument constitute obiter dicta without legal or precedential effect. See State v. Sartin, 200
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13787 - 2005-03-31
constitutional argument constitute obiter dicta without legal or precedential effect. See State v. Sartin, 200
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13787 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 27, 2022 September 27, 2022 To: Hon. David C. Swanson Circuit Court Judge Electronic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571166 - 2022-09-27
. 27, 2022 September 27, 2022 To: Hon. David C. Swanson Circuit Court Judge Electronic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571166 - 2022-09-27
[PDF]
Mid-Plains, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
and unnecessary statements and rulings with respect to Mid-Plains’s constitutional argument constitute obiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13787 - 2014-09-15
and unnecessary statements and rulings with respect to Mid-Plains’s constitutional argument constitute obiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13787 - 2014-09-15
State v. Samuel Nelis
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Samuel Nelis, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25040 - 2006-05-03
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Samuel Nelis, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25040 - 2006-05-03