Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31 - 40 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 31 - 40 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
speedy trial violation. The State appeals the “with prejudice” part of the dismissal order, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196833 - 2017-09-26
speedy trial violation. The State appeals the “with prejudice” part of the dismissal order, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196833 - 2017-09-26
State v. Michael Marks
by a prisoner and an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims his double jeopardy, speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
by a prisoner and an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims his double jeopardy, speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
on this appeal is whether Ted Urdahl’s federal and state constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
on this appeal is whether Ted Urdahl’s federal and state constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. After the dismissal of the charges initially filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. After the dismissal of the charges initially filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State violated his right to a speedy trial. Although the State concedes that the approximately twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
that the State violated his right to a speedy trial. Although the State concedes that the approximately twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 Beahm asserts that the State violated his right to a speedy trial. Although the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108713 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 Beahm asserts that the State violated his right to a speedy trial. Although the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108713 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Melvin D. Parker, Jr.
raising the speedy trial issue. The trial court denied the motion without a hearing, resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4522 - 2017-09-19
raising the speedy trial issue. The trial court denied the motion without a hearing, resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4522 - 2017-09-19
State v. Melvin D. Parker, Jr.
constitutional speedy trial right was violated, and whether the trial court properly decided his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4522 - 2005-03-31
constitutional speedy trial right was violated, and whether the trial court properly decided his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4522 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven S. Walter
that the belated charging in this case violated his federal and state constitutional right to a speedy trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16182 - 2017-09-21
that the belated charging in this case violated his federal and state constitutional right to a speedy trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16182 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven S. Walter
federal and state constitutional right to a speedy trial. We affirm the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16182 - 2005-03-31
federal and state constitutional right to a speedy trial. We affirm the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16182 - 2005-03-31