Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31 - 40 of 21279 for warrants.
Search results 31 - 40 of 21279 for warrants.
State v. Albert Jackowski
inspection warrant to inspect a residence owned by Jackowski for municipal building code violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3169 - 2005-03-31
inspection warrant to inspect a residence owned by Jackowski for municipal building code violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott G. Hagerman
to No. 2005AP565-CR 2 suppression issues. He argues that the anticipatory search warrant used to seize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20322 - 2017-09-21
to No. 2005AP565-CR 2 suppression issues. He argues that the anticipatory search warrant used to seize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20322 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott G. Hagerman
search warrant used to seize a delivered package of marijuana from his residence was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20322 - 2005-11-22
search warrant used to seize a delivered package of marijuana from his residence was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20322 - 2005-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Cherise A. Raflik
a telephonic application for a search warrant is not recorded in accordance with Wis. Stat. § 968.12(3)(d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16378 - 2017-09-21
a telephonic application for a search warrant is not recorded in accordance with Wis. Stat. § 968.12(3)(d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16378 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cherise A. Raflik
whether suppression is the proper remedy when a telephonic application for a search warrant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16378 - 2005-03-31
whether suppression is the proper remedy when a telephonic application for a search warrant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16378 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 176
supporting the search warrant was correct, but the warrant itself identified the wrong vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34570 - 2014-09-15
supporting the search warrant was correct, but the warrant itself identified the wrong vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34570 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
of the search warrant. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable cause and the police were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
of the search warrant. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable cause and the police were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
warrant. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable cause and the police were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8291 - 2017-09-19
warrant. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable cause and the police were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8291 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Smith’s vehicles, an Acura ZDX. The search warrant authorized the search of Smith’s apartment, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042603 - 2025-11-25
. Smith’s vehicles, an Acura ZDX. The search warrant authorized the search of Smith’s apartment, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042603 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-Angulo maintains the procedure used to obtain a telephonic search warrant for a blood draw following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138978 - 2017-09-21
-Angulo maintains the procedure used to obtain a telephonic search warrant for a blood draw following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138978 - 2017-09-21