Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 301 - 310 of 82271 for case code.
Search results 301 - 310 of 82271 for case code.
[PDF]
State v. Fortune in Motion, Inc.
on the meaning to be given “personal services” for purposes of WIS. ADM. CODE § ATCP 122.02(2). While no cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11104 - 2017-09-19
on the meaning to be given “personal services” for purposes of WIS. ADM. CODE § ATCP 122.02(2). While no cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11104 - 2017-09-19
State v. Fortune in Motion, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11104 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11104 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Frasch v. Marianne A. Cooke
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1786
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1786
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
Jane Peckham v. Kristine Krenke
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 violated the Dodge County Land Use Code by having a salvage yard on his property. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197690 - 2017-10-12
1 violated the Dodge County Land Use Code by having a salvage yard on his property. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197690 - 2017-10-12
[PDF]
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
, according to the record in this case, he failed to appeal the violation report pursuant to WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21
, according to the record in this case, he failed to appeal the violation report pursuant to WIS. ADM. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. [1] See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 302.18. [2] Even if we addressed this case under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. [1] See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 302.18. [2] Even if we addressed this case under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Restoration breached Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP 100 (June 2011) (the home improvement code), and postverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90612 - 2012-12-12
Restoration breached Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP 100 (June 2011) (the home improvement code), and postverdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90612 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
their contract with one another, and EA Restoration breached WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. No. 2011AP2855 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90612 - 2014-09-15
their contract with one another, and EA Restoration breached WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. No. 2011AP2855 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90612 - 2014-09-15
Lorell E. Smith v. Westwood Estates, Inc.
on the meaning of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11978 - 2005-03-31
on the meaning of the building code and in not ruling that Westwood had, as a matter of law, violated certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11978 - 2005-03-31