Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 301 - 310 of 773 for leon.
Search results 301 - 310 of 773 for leon.
CA Blank Order
District III March 25, 2014 To: Hon. Leon D. Stenz Circuit Court Judge 200 E Madison St. Crandon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109476 - 2014-03-24
District III March 25, 2014 To: Hon. Leon D. Stenz Circuit Court Judge 200 E Madison St. Crandon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109476 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Leon D. Stenz Circuit Court Judge 200 E. Madison St. Crandon, WI 54520 Penny Carter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218846 - 2018-09-11
To: Hon. Leon D. Stenz Circuit Court Judge 200 E. Madison St. Crandon, WI 54520 Penny Carter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218846 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Florence County: LEON D. STENZ, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70303 - 2014-09-15
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Florence County: LEON D. STENZ, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70303 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt
exception to the exclusionary rule recognized in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918-20 (1984), adding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3477 - 2005-03-31
exception to the exclusionary rule recognized in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918-20 (1984), adding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3477 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
who execute a search warrant in the mistaken belief that it is valid, see United States v. Leon, 468
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29910 - 2007-08-06
who execute a search warrant in the mistaken belief that it is valid, see United States v. Leon, 468
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29910 - 2007-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt
exception to the exclusionary rule recognized in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918-20 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3477 - 2017-09-20
exception to the exclusionary rule recognized in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918-20 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3477 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that it is valid, see United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918-20 (1984), or who take some other action based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29910 - 2014-09-15
that it is valid, see United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918-20 (1984), or who take some other action based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29910 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Susan M. Goetz
of federal law.); State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98 ΒΆ22, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625 (United States v. Leon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3814 - 2017-09-20
of federal law.); State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98 ΒΆ22, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625 (United States v. Leon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3814 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. LEON R. MCQUEEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41714 - 2014-09-15
. LEON R. MCQUEEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41714 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Pekin Insurance Company v. H. Fuller & Sons, Inc.
are not clearly erroneous. See Leon's Frozen Custard, Inc. v. Leon Corp., 182 Wis.2d 236, 243, 513 N.W.2d 636
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8383 - 2017-09-19
are not clearly erroneous. See Leon's Frozen Custard, Inc. v. Leon Corp., 182 Wis.2d 236, 243, 513 N.W.2d 636
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8383 - 2017-09-19