Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 301 - 310 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 301 - 310 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
NOTICE
determination that the title was not claimed under the personal representative’s deed in good faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
determination that the title was not claimed under the personal representative’s deed in good faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that awarded legal title to a disputed parcel of property to Joseph Cogan Jr. and Mary Cogan. Gladys claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
that awarded legal title to a disputed parcel of property to Joseph Cogan Jr. and Mary Cogan. Gladys claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court explained that if Augustus did not deed the Oneida County property to James, as Kimberly claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=389871 - 2021-07-13
. The court explained that if Augustus did not deed the Oneida County property to James, as Kimberly claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=389871 - 2021-07-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the Rayners submitted an August 20, 2003 quit claim deed by which Reeves and his wife transferred real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55400 - 2014-09-15
, the Rayners submitted an August 20, 2003 quit claim deed by which Reeves and his wife transferred real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55400 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, the Rayners submitted an August 20, 2003 quit claim deed by which Reeves and his wife transferred real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55400 - 2010-10-12
, the Rayners submitted an August 20, 2003 quit claim deed by which Reeves and his wife transferred real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55400 - 2010-10-12
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12307 - 2005-03-31
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12307 - 2005-03-31
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12656 - 2005-03-31
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12656 - 2005-03-31
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11916 - 2005-03-31
restriction violation constitutes a nuisance; (10) he is entitled to damages on the deed restriction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11916 - 2005-03-31
Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
adverse possession claims survive the tax deed process. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
adverse possession claims survive the tax deed process. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald C. Kleutgen v. Robert A. McFadyen, Jr.
case, Ronald and Kathleen Kleutgen. We will refer to these parcels as the “northern deeded parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21
case, Ronald and Kathleen Kleutgen. We will refer to these parcels as the “northern deeded parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21