Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 11912 for affidavit.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 11912 for affidavit.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supporting affidavit, Luke averred that Rebecca had not seen the children since approximately April 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592640 - 2022-11-22
supporting affidavit, Luke averred that Rebecca had not seen the children since approximately April 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592640 - 2022-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
typically give “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination that an affidavit for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145295 - 2015-07-29
typically give “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination that an affidavit for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145295 - 2015-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. In support of their objection, USAO and SIST submitted affidavits of several individuals claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2013-03-04
. In support of their objection, USAO and SIST submitted affidavits of several individuals claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a motion for summary judgment “shall serve opposing affidavits, if any, at least 5 days before the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952066 - 2025-05-06
to a motion for summary judgment “shall serve opposing affidavits, if any, at least 5 days before the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952066 - 2025-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Bright Dental 1, LLC. Attached to the second amended complaint, Sandoval included an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03
to Bright Dental 1, LLC. Attached to the second amended complaint, Sandoval included an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
placed from Burris’s home phone to the phone of her friend at 5:31 p.m. and 6:25 p.m.; affidavits from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
placed from Burris’s home phone to the phone of her friend at 5:31 p.m. and 6:25 p.m.; affidavits from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49739 - 2014-09-15
, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49739 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.; affidavits from Burris and that same friend stating that they were talking by phone at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
.; affidavits from Burris and that same friend stating that they were talking by phone at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s ruling. In doing so, we noted that Ward had “not submitted affidavits from any of the [witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108920 - 2014-03-10
court’s ruling. In doing so, we noted that Ward had “not submitted affidavits from any of the [witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108920 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“not submitted affidavits from any of the [witnesses] he referenced, nor has he submitted the discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108920 - 2017-09-21
“not submitted affidavits from any of the [witnesses] he referenced, nor has he submitted the discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108920 - 2017-09-21