Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 69862 for as he.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 69862 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Shane K. Hanson
version unless otherwise noted. Nos. 01-2687-CR 01-2688-CR 2 Hanson contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4462 - 2017-09-19
version unless otherwise noted. Nos. 01-2687-CR 01-2688-CR 2 Hanson contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4462 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
and a black eye. He was charged with one count of substantial battery with intent to cause bodily harm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100154 - 2013-07-29
and a black eye. He was charged with one count of substantial battery with intent to cause bodily harm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100154 - 2013-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
-degree sexual assault. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09
-degree sexual assault. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09
[PDF]
State v. Charles Young-Cooper
is that the trial court incorrectly explained the elements of § 940.227(3)(a), STATS., 1989-90, to him when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14646 - 2017-09-21
is that the trial court incorrectly explained the elements of § 940.227(3)(a), STATS., 1989-90, to him when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14646 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bryan Gary
argues: (1) his plea was unknowing because he was not informed of the maximum potential penalties; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15
argues: (1) his plea was unknowing because he was not informed of the maximum potential penalties; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying, without a hearing, his postconviction motion for a new trial. Pelestor-Jimenez claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90590 - 2012-12-17
an order denying, without a hearing, his postconviction motion for a new trial. Pelestor-Jimenez claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90590 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
State v. Timmy Duerr
operation of a vehicle. See § 940.10, STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11661 - 2017-09-19
operation of a vehicle. See § 940.10, STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11661 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and as a second or subsequent offense. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682452 - 2023-07-26
and as a second or subsequent offense. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682452 - 2023-07-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, resulting in six stiches and a black eye. He was charged with one count of substantial battery
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100154 - 2017-09-21
, resulting in six stiches and a black eye. He was charged with one count of substantial battery
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order denying the motion for postconviction relief that he filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
order denying the motion for postconviction relief that he filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08