Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 69325 for as he.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 69325 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Armando P. Rodriguez
for withdrawal of his Alford plea. 1 Rodriguez contends that he is entitled to withdraw his plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13178 - 2017-09-21
for withdrawal of his Alford plea. 1 Rodriguez contends that he is entitled to withdraw his plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
$8000 per month, the trial court found that he had 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61910 - 2014-09-15
$8000 per month, the trial court found that he had 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61910 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 136
right to a fair trial. In particular, he asserts that the State’s closing argument was fraught
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39591 - 2009-09-28
right to a fair trial. In particular, he asserts that the State’s closing argument was fraught
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39591 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
terminating his maintenance. He argues that the circuit court unreasonably refused to grant him a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217371 - 2018-08-09
terminating his maintenance. He argues that the circuit court unreasonably refused to grant him a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217371 - 2018-08-09
[PDF]
WI APP 136
. In particular, he asserts that the State’s closing argument was fraught with impermissible commentary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39591 - 2014-09-15
. In particular, he asserts that the State’s closing argument was fraught with impermissible commentary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, he claims that a new trial is warranted based on the combined prejudicial effect of several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68840 - 2014-09-15
, he claims that a new trial is warranted based on the combined prejudicial effect of several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68840 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
he wished to request a prompt disposition of the case, and the second indicating he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109461 - 2017-09-21
he wished to request a prompt disposition of the case, and the second indicating he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John M. Anderson
)(b) and 940.31(1)(a) (1995-96). He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7103 - 2017-09-20
)(b) and 940.31(1)(a) (1995-96). He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7103 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
of three counts of repeated first-degree sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56014 - 2014-09-15
of three counts of repeated first-degree sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56014 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sherman B. Rones
entered after he pled guilty to three counts of first-degree sexual assault, while using a dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2988 - 2005-03-31
entered after he pled guilty to three counts of first-degree sexual assault, while using a dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2988 - 2005-03-31