Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
the application of a statute to a set of undisputed facts, and thus is subject to our de novo review. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2013-01-29
the application of a statute to a set of undisputed facts, and thus is subject to our de novo review. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2013-01-29
WI App 8 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP535 Complete Title of C...
It is well established that we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105178 - 2014-10-07
It is well established that we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105178 - 2014-10-07
State v. Kris A. Westberg
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5572 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tammy F.
of statutory construction and interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19
of statutory construction and interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19
State v. Shirlene Davis
presents an issue of law that we resolve de novo. See State v. Eason, 2000 WI App 73 ¶ 3, 234 Wis. 2d 396
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16037 - 2005-03-31
presents an issue of law that we resolve de novo. See State v. Eason, 2000 WI App 73 ¶ 3, 234 Wis. 2d 396
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16037 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Everts
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
2006 WI APP 205
This appeal requires us to apply Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m).[3] Our review is thus de novo. See Dorbritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26218 - 2006-10-30
This appeal requires us to apply Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m).[3] Our review is thus de novo. See Dorbritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26218 - 2006-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact, but, of course, review de novo the trial court’s legal conclusions. See K.N.K. v. Buhler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90674 - 2012-12-17
findings of fact, but, of course, review de novo the trial court’s legal conclusions. See K.N.K. v. Buhler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90674 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19