Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 68326 for did.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 68326 for did.
CA Blank Order
there would be any basis for arguing that Thompson did not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily enter his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147176 - 2015-08-23
there would be any basis for arguing that Thompson did not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily enter his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147176 - 2015-08-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; (2) that D.S. did not consent; and (3) that it could be inferred from Stewart’s acts, words
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162567 - 2017-09-21
; (2) that D.S. did not consent; and (3) that it could be inferred from Stewart’s acts, words
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, during some of these time periods, he called and texted A.C.-E. to try to see E.M.C. but that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258147 - 2020-04-15
that, during some of these time periods, he called and texted A.C.-E. to try to see E.M.C. but that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258147 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court did not err in failing to request an extension to hear Beck’s postconviction motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15
the court did not err in failing to request an extension to hear Beck’s postconviction motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 13
was not aware of this conference and did not attend. An electronically signed scheduling order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898561 - 2025-03-20
was not aware of this conference and did not attend. An electronically signed scheduling order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898561 - 2025-03-20
State v. Gary M. B.
ones. We agree that the trial court did not engage in a proper exercise of discretion when it ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4708 - 2005-03-31
ones. We agree that the trial court did not engage in a proper exercise of discretion when it ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4708 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gordon R. Anderson, Jr.
statement under the doctrine of completeness. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14928 - 2005-03-31
statement under the doctrine of completeness. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14928 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
or its immediate aftermath. ¶2 We conclude the court did not err in failing to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72545 - 2011-10-19
or its immediate aftermath. ¶2 We conclude the court did not err in failing to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72545 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then repeatedly told Cindy that “the doctor put his belly up my butt.” Cindy testified that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=828440 - 2024-07-23
then repeatedly told Cindy that “the doctor put his belly up my butt.” Cindy testified that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=828440 - 2024-07-23
[PDF]
State v. Gary M. B.
convictions to his two most recent ones. We agree that the trial court did not engage in a proper exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4708 - 2017-09-19
convictions to his two most recent ones. We agree that the trial court did not engage in a proper exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4708 - 2017-09-19