Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3001 - 3010 of 78671 for restraining order/1000.

2009 WI APP 143
, Conner was previously convicted of three counts of violating a harassment restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40095 - 2009-10-27

[PDF] WI APP 143
, Conner was previously convicted of three counts of violating a harassment restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40095 - 2014-09-15

Charlotte A. Bausano v. James J. Bausano
no value to the corporation upon liquidation. The court valued the software at $1000. [9] Charlotte’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2441 - 2005-03-31

City of La Crosse v. Brian H. Hoff
before Nedegaard stopped him in an alley off the 1000 block of Main Street. ¶3 Noticing the odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5533 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
yard and further ordered her to remain there, restraining her movement until otherwise directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793456 - 2024-04-25

[PDF] Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
Ins. Co., 166 Wis.2d 1000, 1006, 480 N.W.2d 836, 839 (Ct. App. 1992). We will not disturb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19

09AP1485 Gordon P. Knuth v. Town of Cedarburg.doc
and he was over assessed $455.32. Knuth insists that the correct equalized tax rate is $8.9010 per $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45887 - 2010-01-19

[PDF] NOTICE
that the correct equalized tax rate is $8.9010 per $1000 of equalized valuation. The record before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45887 - 2014-09-15

Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
discretion to determine whether excusable neglect exists. Gerth v. American Star Ins. Co., 166 Wis.2d 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11654 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randy R. Cooke
sentencing discretion. He maintains that six months in jail for violating a domestic restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16205 - 2005-03-31