Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30001 - 30010 of 57351 for id.

State v. Vincent J. Longo
is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. (quoting State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14875 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jacquelyn R. Brotherton v. Paul E. Brotherton
. See id. at 587. We turn to Jacquelyn’s claim that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12621 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for the termination of parental rights have been” proved. Id., ¶26 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 48.424(3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014645 - 2025-09-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The circuit court proceeded to find B.R. in default, which was a matter within its discretion. Id., ¶18
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377446 - 2021-06-11

[PDF] City of Clintonville v. Michael J. Kuhn
enforcement officer could conclude that Kuhn had probably committed OMVWI. Id.; State v. Wille, 185 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3919 - 2017-09-20

Daniel J. Cowick v. David H. Schwarz
supports the findings. Id. at 656. “If substantial evidence supports the Division’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20022 - 2005-10-25

[PDF] AM Transportation, Inc. v. Matarah Industries, Inc.
. Id. If the moving party has indeed made a prima facie case for summary judgment, we then examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2436 - 2017-09-19

Tommy Brown v. Gary R. McCaughtry
whether to uphold the agency decision. Id. at 385-86. On a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20070 - 2005-10-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a common sense test that turns on the totality of the facts and circumstances. Id. In assessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285364 - 2020-09-09

[PDF] County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
, taking into consideration the “totality of the circumstances.” Id. at 139-40, 456 N.W.2d at 834-35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12876 - 2017-09-21