Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90209 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90209 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, the Alabama Supreme Court distinguished these cases, explaining: In those cases, the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112357 - 2014-05-12
. However, the Alabama Supreme Court distinguished these cases, explaining: In those cases, the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112357 - 2014-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief. ¶2 Lale was convicted in this case pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72447 - 2011-10-25
the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief. ¶2 Lale was convicted in this case pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72447 - 2011-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
this case went to trial and is procedural in nature. The trial court held the statute applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2005-03-31
this case went to trial and is procedural in nature. The trial court held the statute applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
At oral argument, the parties agreed that this case is moot as it relates to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92280 - 2013-01-30
At oral argument, the parties agreed that this case is moot as it relates to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92280 - 2013-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
were far more serious than those in this case. Third, and most importantly, the Martin court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55723 - 2010-10-18
were far more serious than those in this case. Third, and most importantly, the Martin court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55723 - 2010-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 11, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97794 - 2013-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 11, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97794 - 2013-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
the officer’s warnings. The court denied Green’s request to refer to some notes and case law while testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117692 - 2014-07-22
the officer’s warnings. The court denied Green’s request to refer to some notes and case law while testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117692 - 2014-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 18, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84916 - 2012-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 18, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84916 - 2012-07-17