Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Jonathon D. Bell
their daughters’ statements. At the March 30, 1998 postconviction hearing, Bell offered to have the affiants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13998 - 2005-03-31
their daughters’ statements. At the March 30, 1998 postconviction hearing, Bell offered to have the affiants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13998 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Jennings made this statement before the seizure had occurred, and the body camera video shows Jennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317204 - 2020-12-22
that Jennings made this statement before the seizure had occurred, and the body camera video shows Jennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317204 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
of him. Kirpatrick nodded affirmatively, but refused to sign a statement to that effect. ¶10 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28487 - 2014-09-15
of him. Kirpatrick nodded affirmatively, but refused to sign a statement to that effect. ¶10 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28487 - 2014-09-15
State v. John W. Kelley
moved for summary judgment based on a stipulated statement of facts, the pleadings, answers
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17507 - 2005-03-31
moved for summary judgment based on a stipulated statement of facts, the pleadings, answers
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17507 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Ruby Washington
of contempt law onto a carefully designed treatment system solely because of an improvident statement earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24633 - 2006-05-30
of contempt law onto a carefully designed treatment system solely because of an improvident statement earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24633 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
Dawn Sukala v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
the court's proceeding to an ambiguous statement in its conclusion because that statement implied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18668 - 2017-09-21
the court's proceeding to an ambiguous statement in its conclusion because that statement implied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. To establish mutual mistake, the Bakers must show that they “made certain statements to the agent concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195920 - 2017-09-21
. To establish mutual mistake, the Bakers must show that they “made certain statements to the agent concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties’ statements, the circuit court discussed the gravity of the offenses, Winfield’s character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252580 - 2020-01-22
the parties’ statements, the circuit court discussed the gravity of the offenses, Winfield’s character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252580 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Dean Garfoot
by § 971.13(1), STATS., is not only a statement of his present condition but a prediction. If the prediction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7956 - 2017-09-19
by § 971.13(1), STATS., is not only a statement of his present condition but a prediction. If the prediction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the change in placement, a statement describing why the new placement is preferable to the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53678 - 2014-09-15
for the change in placement, a statement describing why the new placement is preferable to the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53678 - 2014-09-15