Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 63539 for records.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 63539 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supported by the record, and he does not direct us to any evidence that would support the jury’s $60,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103212 - 2017-09-21
supported by the record, and he does not direct us to any evidence that would support the jury’s $60,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103212 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James L. Gilmore
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
) the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Reed Cudnohusky
for counsel to rely on other evidence in the record rather than expert testimony. Although the officer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12355 - 2017-09-21
for counsel to rely on other evidence in the record rather than expert testimony. Although the officer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the record does not demonstrate that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30079 - 2014-09-15
the record does not demonstrate that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and No. 2023AP1090-CR 2 Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853076 - 2024-09-25
of the briefs and No. 2023AP1090-CR 2 Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853076 - 2024-09-25
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and No. 2023AP1090-CR 2 Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853076 - 2024-09-25
of the briefs and No. 2023AP1090-CR 2 Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853076 - 2024-09-25
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Kimmes
the record was filed with this court, this court ordered the parties to address in their briefs whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13129 - 2017-09-21
the record was filed with this court, this court ordered the parties to address in their briefs whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13129 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
discretion because (1) the record did not support the court’s rationale for the sentence imposed, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32710 - 2014-09-15
discretion because (1) the record did not support the court’s rationale for the sentence imposed, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32710 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit and supplemental no-merit reports, Luckett’s response, and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16
no-merit and supplemental no-merit reports, Luckett’s response, and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264501 - 2020-06-16