Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the age of thirteen, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2009-10),2 following a jury trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76078 - 2014-09-15
the age of thirteen, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2009-10),2 following a jury trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76078 - 2014-09-15
Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
a dominant interest pursuant to an easement over property owned by Esther Darnell. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9230 - 2005-03-31
a dominant interest pursuant to an easement over property owned by Esther Darnell. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9230 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of these defendants were liable to Hernandez for Romero’s negligence. ¶6 The trial court held a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30193 - 2007-09-10
of these defendants were liable to Hernandez for Romero’s negligence. ¶6 The trial court held a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30193 - 2007-09-10
State v. Rex B. Roberts
to deliver. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied Roberts' motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
to deliver. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied Roberts' motion to suppress physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
over property owned by Esther Darnell. The trial court concluded that it does not. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19
over property owned by Esther Darnell. The trial court concluded that it does not. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James E. Szulczewski
his constitutional challenge to § 940.20(1), STATS., by failing to raise it in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10802 - 2017-09-20
his constitutional challenge to § 940.20(1), STATS., by failing to raise it in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10802 - 2017-09-20
Dale G. Eisner v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
in the amount of $8,353.72.[2] Prior to trial, American Family and the Eisners entered into an agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16311 - 2005-03-31
in the amount of $8,353.72.[2] Prior to trial, American Family and the Eisners entered into an agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16311 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randolph S. Guenterberg
. Guenterberg entered Alford pleas after the trial court denied his motions to suppress evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9030 - 2005-03-31
. Guenterberg entered Alford pleas after the trial court denied his motions to suppress evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9030 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a bench trial, awarding $5,000 (plus $570.25 for statutory attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465734 - 2021-12-23
a bench trial, awarding $5,000 (plus $570.25 for statutory attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465734 - 2021-12-23
[PDF]
Smith and Spidahl Enterprises, Inc. v. Mark H. Lee
-2- judgment. The trial court held that because Ag-Tech's financing statement contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10610 - 2017-09-20
-2- judgment. The trial court held that because Ag-Tech's financing statement contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10610 - 2017-09-20