Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30021 - 30030 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 30021 - 30030 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. David A. Prusinski
, 401 N.W.2d at 767. Prusinski claims that the failure to bring him before a court in a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11586 - 2007-11-13
, 401 N.W.2d at 767. Prusinski claims that the failure to bring him before a court in a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11586 - 2007-11-13
State v. James E. Ganey
of four counts of fourth degree sexual assault, contrary to § 940.225(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11984 - 2013-08-13
of four counts of fourth degree sexual assault, contrary to § 940.225(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11984 - 2013-08-13
Four Seasons FS, Inc. v. Glen Mohn
.2d 752, 757-58 (1990). The dispute arises from Mohn's claim that after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12993 - 2005-03-31
.2d 752, 757-58 (1990). The dispute arises from Mohn's claim that after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12993 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Durrah
motion seeking a modification of his sentence. In the motion, Durrah claimed the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2236 - 2005-03-31
motion seeking a modification of his sentence. In the motion, Durrah claimed the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2236 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Fecke
nonetheless claims the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; § 302.095(2) is unconstitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
nonetheless claims the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; § 302.095(2) is unconstitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stacey R.W.
if the parent convinces the trial court that he or she did not know of the right. Here, Stacey claims he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
if the parent convinces the trial court that he or she did not know of the right. Here, Stacey claims he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale Gould, Jr.
. § 948.02(1),[1] and an order denying his postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2406 - 2005-03-31
. § 948.02(1),[1] and an order denying his postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
§ 32.10, STATS., in which Selgren claimed that its real estate “has been occupied and taken by [the DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11720 - 2017-09-20
§ 32.10, STATS., in which Selgren claimed that its real estate “has been occupied and taken by [the DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11720 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Dale Gould, Jr.
an order denying his postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Gould argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Gould argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2496 - 2014-06-05
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2496 - 2014-06-05