Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30021 - 30030 of 64765 for b's.
Search results 30021 - 30030 of 64765 for b's.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
applying the felony-repeater provision. See WIS. STAT. § 939.62(1)(b) (permitting four years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02
applying the felony-repeater provision. See WIS. STAT. § 939.62(1)(b) (permitting four years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48124 - 2010-03-17
. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48124 - 2010-03-17
State v. Thomas J. McPhetridge
court did not err in admitting evidence of McPhetridge’s custodial statement. B. McPhetridge offers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
court did not err in admitting evidence of McPhetridge’s custodial statement. B. McPhetridge offers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4890 - 2005-03-31
Jerome Esser v. David Beers
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12171 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12171 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
charges that Chand is subject to removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) as an “alien who at any time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130022 - 2014-11-24
charges that Chand is subject to removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) as an “alien who at any time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130022 - 2014-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) and (b). Lindert moved to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of the officer’s warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04
)(a) and (b). Lindert moved to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of the officer’s warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 Bilbrey also asserts counsel performed deficiently “[b]ecause he [f]ailed to [i]nvestigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
1 Bilbrey also asserts counsel performed deficiently “[b]ecause he [f]ailed to [i]nvestigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997158 - 2025-08-20
State v. Barry Howard
proper result, albeit for the wrong reason). B. Rebuttal Witnesses. Howard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9583 - 2005-03-31
proper result, albeit for the wrong reason). B. Rebuttal Witnesses. Howard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9583 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd S. Sincock
claim that his constitutional rights were violated by the trial court’s action. B. Trial Court Bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12949 - 2005-03-31
claim that his constitutional rights were violated by the trial court’s action. B. Trial Court Bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12949 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02