Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30021 - 30030 of 57394 for id.
Search results 30021 - 30030 of 57394 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
of pretrial detention. Id. (quotation marks and citations omitted). ¶8 The trial court must “specify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69297 - 2011-08-08
of pretrial detention. Id. (quotation marks and citations omitted). ¶8 The trial court must “specify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69297 - 2011-08-08
2009 WI APP 6
it or bargain it away.” Id. at 169. ¶8 The Schomberg court recognized that inalienability of the power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34749 - 2009-01-27
it or bargain it away.” Id. at 169. ¶8 The Schomberg court recognized that inalienability of the power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34749 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel performed deficiently and prejudicially are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161628 - 2017-09-21
counsel performed deficiently and prejudicially are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161628 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶12, 280 Wis. 2d 860, 695 N.W.2d 895. Each of those four options includes its own time frame. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236025 - 2019-02-26
, ¶12, 280 Wis. 2d 860, 695 N.W.2d 895. Each of those four options includes its own time frame. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236025 - 2019-02-26
State v. Mark J. Zimmerman
, an emotional one. Id. ¶8 Zimmerman reasons that because he was standing trial for the OWI charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6158 - 2005-03-31
, an emotional one. Id. ¶8 Zimmerman reasons that because he was standing trial for the OWI charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6158 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. A defendant who moves for resentencing on the ground that the trial court relied on inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76597 - 2012-01-17
. Id. A defendant who moves for resentencing on the ground that the trial court relied on inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76597 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
). Statutory language is deemed ambiguous if reasonable persons could disagree about its meaning. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
). Statutory language is deemed ambiguous if reasonable persons could disagree about its meaning. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the orderly administration of justice.” Id., ¶11 & n.2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366652 - 2021-05-13
of the orderly administration of justice.” Id., ¶11 & n.2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366652 - 2021-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence or substitute our discretion for that of the agency. Id., ¶13. ¶8 Here, the record plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704891 - 2023-09-19
of the evidence or substitute our discretion for that of the agency. Id., ¶13. ¶8 Here, the record plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704891 - 2023-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
relevant facts of record, or has failed to arrive at a reasonable result. Id.; Duffy v. Duffy, 132 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82229 - 2012-05-09
relevant facts of record, or has failed to arrive at a reasonable result. Id.; Duffy v. Duffy, 132 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82229 - 2012-05-09