Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30021 - 30030 of 63603 for records.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31

State v. Trederick Nelson
truthful testimony. ¶10 From our review of the record, we find sufficient and probative evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
is supported by the record; (2) if the issue presents a legal question as to whether the undisputed facts here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05

COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did not order a [presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03

Kemakolam Michael Obasih v. Kanelichi Esther Obasih
discretionary determination if the record shows that discretion was exercised and we can perceive a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5875 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02

[PDF] Threshermens Mutual Insurance Company v. Robert Page
The record is unclear as to whether the trial court actually ruled on the future medical expenses claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9872 - 2017-09-19

MacFarlane Pheasant Farm, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin
a right of action against the condemnor” in “a court of record,” which may lead to a judgment that “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17944 - 2005-04-27

[PDF] James Milam v. Department of Natural Resources
examination of the entire record reveals that “the evidence, including the inferences therefrom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14099 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by midnight. Moreover, based on my review, I conclude that the record supports each of the court’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173629 - 2017-09-21