Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30031 - 30040 of 65143 for or b.
Search results 30031 - 30040 of 65143 for or b.
State v. Renee L. Reek
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Tina B. v. Richard H., 2014 WI App 123, ¶¶45-49, 359 Wis. 2d 204, 857 N.W.2d 432. “A circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050549 - 2025-12-16
. Tina B. v. Richard H., 2014 WI App 123, ¶¶45-49, 359 Wis. 2d 204, 857 N.W.2d 432. “A circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050549 - 2025-12-16
George A. Mudrovich v. Shar Soto
. § 134.01 claim as barred by the Act’s exclusive remedy provision. B. Frivolous Claim ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15580 - 2005-03-31
. § 134.01 claim as barred by the Act’s exclusive remedy provision. B. Frivolous Claim ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15580 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Laurie M. Marcukaitis v. State of Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
or misinterpretation of the law or mistake of evidentiary fact, whether by commission or omission; or (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7219 - 2017-09-20
or misinterpretation of the law or mistake of evidentiary fact, whether by commission or omission; or (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7219 - 2017-09-20
State v. Nicole O.
after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7673 - 2005-03-31
after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7673 - 2005-03-31
Peggy Sue Podolak v. John Peter Podolak
to the trial court’s discretion. Wis. Stat. § 767.25(1)(b). The trial court decided to award the exemption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6283 - 2005-03-31
to the trial court’s discretion. Wis. Stat. § 767.25(1)(b). The trial court decided to award the exemption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6283 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph P. Sutherland
with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration, third offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2554 - 2005-03-31
with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration, third offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Loss Prevention Systems v. Alpha Omega Security, Inc.
. ALPHA OMEGA SECURITY, INC. AND MILWAUKEE LISBON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A LONDON SQUARE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14360 - 2014-09-15
. ALPHA OMEGA SECURITY, INC. AND MILWAUKEE LISBON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A LONDON SQUARE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14360 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Stat. §§ 940.06(1) & 939.63(1)(b) (2011-12).[1] Lowe’s postconviction and appellate lawyer, Jeffrey W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136772 - 2015-03-03
. Stat. §§ 940.06(1) & 939.63(1)(b) (2011-12).[1] Lowe’s postconviction and appellate lawyer, Jeffrey W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136772 - 2015-03-03
State v. Romell Quin
must affirm. B. The State’s arguments fail because the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13962 - 2005-03-31
must affirm. B. The State’s arguments fail because the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13962 - 2005-03-31