Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30041 - 30050 of 40042 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 30041 - 30050 of 40042 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statements makes clear that this was an inadvertent misstatement. No. 2023AP471-CR 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20
statements makes clear that this was an inadvertent misstatement. No. 2023AP471-CR 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20
State v. Michael H. Woeshnick
complaint is “a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.” Section 968.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14862 - 2005-03-31
complaint is “a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.” Section 968.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly A. Tomaras
. 2 In Tomaras’s statement of the case and facts, she occasionally refers to herself as “he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5218 - 2017-09-19
. 2 In Tomaras’s statement of the case and facts, she occasionally refers to herself as “he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5218 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lynwood E. Huntoon
that the companion’s conduct constituted disorderly conduct, the State contends that Huntoon’s statement, “You’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2427 - 2005-03-31
that the companion’s conduct constituted disorderly conduct, the State contends that Huntoon’s statement, “You’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2427 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas A. Braun v. Paul Duren
long as the statements ‘bear a proper relationship to the issues.’” Snow v. Koeppl, 159 Wis.2d 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11423 - 2017-09-19
long as the statements ‘bear a proper relationship to the issues.’” Snow v. Koeppl, 159 Wis.2d 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11423 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the State immediately corrected itself and that he did not object to the second statement because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062176 - 2026-01-13
the State immediately corrected itself and that he did not object to the second statement because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062176 - 2026-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
in the informant’s statements, (3) whether the police independently corroborated the information, (4) the interval
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36959 - 2009-06-29
in the informant’s statements, (3) whether the police independently corroborated the information, (4) the interval
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36959 - 2009-06-29
CA Blank Order
. The no-merit report contains a correct statement of the law governing these issues and properly applies the law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91118 - 2013-01-02
. The no-merit report contains a correct statement of the law governing these issues and properly applies the law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91118 - 2013-01-02
State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
, general statement that non-prohibited factors prompted its strikes. Rather, the State must specify those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2842 - 2005-03-31
, general statement that non-prohibited factors prompted its strikes. Rather, the State must specify those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2842 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary E. Waters
was admissible as a prior consistent statement as allowed by Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4)(a). Waters does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5751 - 2005-03-31
was admissible as a prior consistent statement as allowed by Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4)(a). Waters does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5751 - 2005-03-31