Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30051 - 30060 of 82830 for case search.
Search results 30051 - 30060 of 82830 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Alan Thomas LaPean
, with ONE COUNT OF SUBSTANTIAL BATTERY, in violation of § 940.19(2) of the Wisconsin Statutes, in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7386 - 2017-09-20
, with ONE COUNT OF SUBSTANTIAL BATTERY, in violation of § 940.19(2) of the Wisconsin Statutes, in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7386 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Kimberly S. S. v. Sebastian X. L.
2005 WI App 83 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 04-3219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7677 - 2017-09-19
2005 WI App 83 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 04-3219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7677 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ricky Jones
This case has a protracted procedural history which has been complicated by Jones’s repeated filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13657 - 2005-03-31
This case has a protracted procedural history which has been complicated by Jones’s repeated filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that she had testified in other cases as an expert where she had not conducted the autopsy but had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251187 - 2019-12-09
that she had testified in other cases as an expert where she had not conducted the autopsy but had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251187 - 2019-12-09
John W. Ernst, v. Berndt Buick Company
fact is in dispute. Therefore, we reverse the order and the judgment and remand the case for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8786 - 2005-03-31
fact is in dispute. Therefore, we reverse the order and the judgment and remand the case for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8786 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
noted the local OWI guidelines, which in Weaver’s case provided for a jail sentence of 110 days, or 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147680 - 2015-08-30
noted the local OWI guidelines, which in Weaver’s case provided for a jail sentence of 110 days, or 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147680 - 2015-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude claim preclusion is inapplicable to the facts of this case. We therefore reverse on that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218839 - 2018-09-11
conclude claim preclusion is inapplicable to the facts of this case. We therefore reverse on that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218839 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the first two requirements have been satisfied in this case, and that the sole remaining issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361850 - 2021-04-29
that the first two requirements have been satisfied in this case, and that the sole remaining issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361850 - 2021-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Syed Hasan Turab
witnesses needed for their case. Next, Turab contends the trial court erred in its conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10084 - 2017-09-19
witnesses needed for their case. Next, Turab contends the trial court erred in its conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10084 - 2017-09-19
2008 WI APP 82
2008 WI App 82 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2357-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32302 - 2008-05-27
2008 WI App 82 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2357-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32302 - 2008-05-27