Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30051 - 30060 of 36299 for e's.

State v. Percell L. Parker
, the State neglects to point out that the court made the following statement at the same time: “[W]e heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
order, “[w]e do not deal with the question of whether the circuit court made the right decision. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63754 - 2011-05-10

Door County Department of Health & Family Services v. Scott S.
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Mary E. Waitrovich, assistant state public defender. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
Center 200 Oak St., PO Box 246 Mauston, WI 53948 Jefren E. Olsen Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106457 - 2014-01-06

Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District v. Armijit Sidhu
. The brief stated: [A]ttorney Paul E. Kremer appeared before the Town Board on June 12, 2000 to fully advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7134 - 2005-03-31

Town of LaGrange v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment
. The brief stated: [A]ttorney Paul E. Kremer appeared before the Town Board on June 12, 2000 to fully advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7132 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Williams
: On behalf of the petitioner-respondent/plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10833 - 2005-03-31

State v. Vernon D. Fields
, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Kelly L. Goss, assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3916 - 2005-03-31

Janet M. Klawitter v. Elmer H. Klawitter
adopted an important qualifier: “[W]e are of the opinion that an allowance for use and occupancy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2647 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
it necessary to “significantly deviat[e]” from the parties’ sentencing recommendations. It imposed a thirteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54673 - 2010-09-28