Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30071 - 30080 of 63198 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS
for reasons to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decisions, and we search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96371 - 2013-05-06

COURT OF APPEALS
sought clarification of the record because the circuit court’s decision on the motion did not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14

CA Blank Order
for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105521 - 2005-03-31

State v. Raymond Massie
have supported the dual enhancers. Yet there is nothing in the record to suggest that dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13922 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
as the substance of Dr. Lytton’s opinion, and as a result, there was no basis in the record on which a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309114 - 2020-12-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607134 - 2023-01-04

[PDF] NOTICE
on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing “some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43710 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issue of arguable merit appears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190822 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665124 - 2023-06-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the appellant’s brief and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277270 - 2020-08-11