Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3011 - 3020 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 3011 - 3020 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
Thomas J. Awen v.
payments. Finally, the referee recommended that Attorney Awen be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17151 - 2017-09-21
payments. Finally, the referee recommended that Attorney Awen be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
, “the Reusches”) $38,368.16 for damages and costs, including attorney fees. Roob argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3409 - 2017-09-19
, “the Reusches”) $38,368.16 for damages and costs, including attorney fees. Roob argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3409 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary A. Miller
conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which are $5486.86, as of July 21, 2005, should be assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24
conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which are $5486.86, as of July 21, 2005, should be assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24
Thomas J. Awen v.
payments. Finally, the referee recommended that Attorney Awen be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17151 - 2005-03-31
payments. Finally, the referee recommended that Attorney Awen be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17151 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 21
the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which are $2579.81 as of December 13, 2006. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28172 - 2014-09-15
the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which are $2579.81 as of December 13, 2006. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
the judgments. ¶2 Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal2 is frivolous because her arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25523 - 2017-09-21
the judgments. ¶2 Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal2 is frivolous because her arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Thaddeus J. Derynda
action seeking to recover the costs incurred or associated with the razing and removing of Derynda’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4638 - 2017-09-19
action seeking to recover the costs incurred or associated with the razing and removing of Derynda’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4638 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary A. Miller
for the misconduct is a public reprimand. In addition, we conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20065 - 2017-09-21
for the misconduct is a public reprimand. In addition, we conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20065 - 2017-09-21
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal[2] is frivolous because her arguments have no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal[2] is frivolous because her arguments have no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James H. Martin
that the Board had urged. The referee also recommended that Attorney Martin be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17481 - 2005-03-31
that the Board had urged. The referee also recommended that Attorney Martin be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17481 - 2005-03-31