Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3011 - 3020 of 78671 for restraining order/1000.
Search results 3011 - 3020 of 78671 for restraining order/1000.
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added oral argument dates for April, 2013; order in case no. 2011AP414
rights in navigable waters” under § 310.02(1), by considering the effects of the water level order
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92914 - 2014-09-15
rights in navigable waters” under § 310.02(1), by considering the effects of the water level order
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92914 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 143
, Conner was previously convicted of three counts of violating a harassment restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40095 - 2009-10-27
, Conner was previously convicted of three counts of violating a harassment restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40095 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
WI APP 143
, Conner was previously convicted of three counts of violating a harassment restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40095 - 2014-09-15
, Conner was previously convicted of three counts of violating a harassment restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40095 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
yard and further ordered her to remain there, restraining her movement until otherwise directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793456 - 2024-04-25
yard and further ordered her to remain there, restraining her movement until otherwise directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793456 - 2024-04-25
State v. Randy R. Cooke
sentencing discretion. He maintains that six months in jail for violating a domestic restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16205 - 2005-03-31
sentencing discretion. He maintains that six months in jail for violating a domestic restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy R. Cooke
for violating a domestic restraining order is unusual. He points out that “[t]here was no violence committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16205 - 2017-09-21
for violating a domestic restraining order is unusual. He points out that “[t]here was no violence committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16205 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason R. Dixon
for violating the temporary restraining order issued on February 28, 2001, and the conditions of his bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5327 - 2017-09-19
for violating the temporary restraining order issued on February 28, 2001, and the conditions of his bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5327 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jason R. Dixon
for violating the temporary restraining order issued on February 28, 2001, and the conditions of his bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5328 - 2017-09-19
for violating the temporary restraining order issued on February 28, 2001, and the conditions of his bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5328 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a standing order for the EMT-Paramedics [from the Baraboo District Ambulance Service] … to draw legal blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141392 - 2015-05-06
a standing order for the EMT-Paramedics [from the Baraboo District Ambulance Service] … to draw legal blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141392 - 2015-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Mendoza stating, “I have authorized a standing order for the EMT-Paramedics [from the Baraboo District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141392 - 2017-09-21
Mendoza stating, “I have authorized a standing order for the EMT-Paramedics [from the Baraboo District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141392 - 2017-09-21