Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30101 - 30110 of 38135 for d's.
Search results 30101 - 30110 of 38135 for d's.
Certification
” or by a “preponderance of the evidence.” See United States v. Owens, 965 F. Supp. 158, 162-63 (D. Mass. 1997) (whether
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30956 - 2007-11-20
” or by a “preponderance of the evidence.” See United States v. Owens, 965 F. Supp. 158, 162-63 (D. Mass. 1997) (whether
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30956 - 2007-11-20
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
satisfied its fact-finding duties when it “assume[d] that these [were] the facts.” We conclude, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
satisfied its fact-finding duties when it “assume[d] that these [were] the facts.” We conclude, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was thirty years. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.06(1), 939.50(3)(d), 939.63(1)(b). Lowe’s sentence is within
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136772 - 2015-03-03
was thirty years. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.06(1), 939.50(3)(d), 939.63(1)(b). Lowe’s sentence is within
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136772 - 2015-03-03
2010 WI APP 137
brief. An appellant’s failure to provide record citations violates Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d)-(1)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54419 - 2010-10-26
brief. An appellant’s failure to provide record citations violates Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d)-(1)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54419 - 2010-10-26
State v. Odell M. Hardison
on appeal”). D. Sentencing. ¶18 Hardison claims that the trial court sentenced him “based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20812 - 2005-12-27
on appeal”). D. Sentencing. ¶18 Hardison claims that the trial court sentenced him “based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20812 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the woman would “have [him] locked up so [he] c[oul]d try to go get in the penitentiary so [he] can make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104459 - 2017-09-21
that the woman would “have [him] locked up so [he] c[oul]d try to go get in the penitentiary so [he] can make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104459 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gilbert H. Butzlaff
) Testifies to a lack of memory of the subject matter of the declarant's statement; or (d) Is unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10904 - 2005-03-31
) Testifies to a lack of memory of the subject matter of the declarant's statement; or (d) Is unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10904 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 215
meaning). In Section XVI(1), under “CONDITIONS OF WORK,” the Standards mandate that “[d]uring the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29944 - 2014-09-15
meaning). In Section XVI(1), under “CONDITIONS OF WORK,” the Standards mandate that “[d]uring the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nicole O.
members, and whether it would be harmful to the child to sever these relationships. (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7674 - 2017-09-19
members, and whether it would be harmful to the child to sever these relationships. (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7674 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the final lift. Consequently, there is no evidence the contractors “ignore[d their] No. 2009AP1354
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49918 - 2014-09-15
the final lift. Consequently, there is no evidence the contractors “ignore[d their] No. 2009AP1354
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49918 - 2014-09-15