Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30101 - 30110 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 30101 - 30110 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Lonnie J. Kvapil
of Porter’s statement serves, in part, to rebut the prejudice that Kvapil presumes. See Thompson v. Borg, 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12315 - 2005-03-31
of Porter’s statement serves, in part, to rebut the prejudice that Kvapil presumes. See Thompson v. Borg, 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12315 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statements makes clear that this was an inadvertent misstatement. No. 2023AP471-CR 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20
statements makes clear that this was an inadvertent misstatement. No. 2023AP471-CR 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
includes Maus’s statement that he tried to bite an officer. Written reports by other officers present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
includes Maus’s statement that he tried to bite an officer. Written reports by other officers present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
remorse despite his statement expressing remorse. He argued the court’s reliance on inaccurate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652078 - 2023-05-04
remorse despite his statement expressing remorse. He argued the court’s reliance on inaccurate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652078 - 2023-05-04
State v. Gary E. Waters
was admissible as a prior consistent statement as allowed by Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4)(a). Waters does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5751 - 2005-03-31
was admissible as a prior consistent statement as allowed by Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4)(a). Waters does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5751 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David A. Kress
goods on Kress’s person, neither the demeanor, statements, nor conduct of the detaining officers gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6118 - 2017-09-19
goods on Kress’s person, neither the demeanor, statements, nor conduct of the detaining officers gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6118 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
, and the court advised the jury not to consider the testimony to establish the truth of the statement. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141571 - 2015-05-07
, and the court advised the jury not to consider the testimony to establish the truth of the statement. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141571 - 2015-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
-2058-CR 5 consistent with Penigar’s statement at the time he entered his plea, that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
-2058-CR 5 consistent with Penigar’s statement at the time he entered his plea, that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William H. Jones
enforcement officers’ statements that Jones was brought before the intoxilyzer and was asked to blow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15086 - 2017-09-21
enforcement officers’ statements that Jones was brought before the intoxilyzer and was asked to blow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15086 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the shooting. They identified Grady as the shooter. Grady also implicated himself in statements to others1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914981 - 2025-02-19
of the shooting. They identified Grady as the shooter. Grady also implicated himself in statements to others1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914981 - 2025-02-19