Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30111 - 30120 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 30111 - 30120 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
Robert Steigerwaldt v. Township of King
final statement expressing “concern.” Under these circumstances, Steigerwaldt’s attorney’s authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13921 - 2014-09-15
final statement expressing “concern.” Under these circumstances, Steigerwaldt’s attorney’s authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frank Ithier
in the offenses, and the jury could reasonably accept their testimony and out-of-court statements. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12401 - 2017-09-21
in the offenses, and the jury could reasonably accept their testimony and out-of-court statements. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12401 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and entered the judgment. [3] Schmidt also sought to suppress his statement; however, because he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87110 - 2012-09-17
and entered the judgment. [3] Schmidt also sought to suppress his statement; however, because he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87110 - 2012-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
basis for his plea. Lay argues a handwritten statement he brought to the plea hearing proved his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51998 - 2010-07-12
basis for his plea. Lay argues a handwritten statement he brought to the plea hearing proved his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51998 - 2010-07-12
CA Blank Order
discrepancies between the victim’s police statement and her preliminary hearing testimony. To the extent Mann
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
discrepancies between the victim’s police statement and her preliminary hearing testimony. To the extent Mann
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that formed the basis for the charge was the eighty-eight-year- old victim’s statement that Xiong
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137016 - 2017-09-21
that formed the basis for the charge was the eighty-eight-year- old victim’s statement that Xiong
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137016 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, all as a repeat offender. The charges were largely based on witness statements and Nash’s own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27609 - 2014-09-15
, all as a repeat offender. The charges were largely based on witness statements and Nash’s own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27609 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 4 Kolstad also makes a brief argument that his statements were not voluntary. A confession may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30353 - 2014-09-15
. 4 Kolstad also makes a brief argument that his statements were not voluntary. A confession may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Terry R.H.
, the statement at issue did not prejudice him. The order for recommitment is therefore affirmed. An initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12794 - 2017-09-21
, the statement at issue did not prejudice him. The order for recommitment is therefore affirmed. An initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12794 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
Fex’s vehicle, we affirm. STATEMENT OF FACTS ¶2 On March 17, 2009, Fex was charged with one court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60272 - 2011-02-22
Fex’s vehicle, we affirm. STATEMENT OF FACTS ¶2 On March 17, 2009, Fex was charged with one court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60272 - 2011-02-22