Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30111 - 30120 of 69007 for had.

State v. Peter J. Long
the order for seizure of Long’s truck, the vehicle that had been used in the offense. Stemming from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4622 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
response brief had been filed. Between our November 19, 2013 order directing Krupp to serve Small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117799 - 2014-06-29

State v. John Lee Schaefer
possession of child pornography. We conclude that the warrant-issuing judge had a substantial basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4465 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Stephen M. Kailin v. Perry J. Armstrong
had a history of delinquency in rent payments and was in default both at the time the offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3904 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was “aware that [Chelt] had delivered to the City a letter of credit”—as evidence of the letter’s existence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859845 - 2024-10-08

Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
to as “Ameritech” in this opinion). The court concluded that while the Commission had correctly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5929 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John Lee Schaefer
that the warrant-issuing judge had a substantial basis for concluding that there was probable cause to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4465 - 2017-09-19

Marjorie R. Maguire v. Journal Sentinel, Inc.
in the record to warrant such a conclusion and, in fact, none of the members of the jury pool had ever heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13408 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Marjorie R. Maguire v. Journal Sentinel, Inc.
at the injunction hearing. The statement stemmed from a private conversation the Journal reporter had with Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13408 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
to as “Ameritech” in this opinion). The court concluded that while the Commission had correctly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5929 - 2017-09-19