Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30111 - 30120 of 55207 for n c.
Search results 30111 - 30120 of 55207 for n c.
State v. Renee L. Reek
-for-day credit: “[a]n offender is entitled to have his or her total sentence credited with one day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
-for-day credit: “[a]n offender is entitled to have his or her total sentence credited with one day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
, unpublished slip op. at 4 n.3. This was in accord with the request by Post 2874 in their appellate brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21367 - 2017-09-21
, unpublished slip op. at 4 n.3. This was in accord with the request by Post 2874 in their appellate brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21367 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by some courts that the amnesia might be feigned is not present here.” Id. at 346 n.1. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907144 - 2025-01-29
by some courts that the amnesia might be feigned is not present here.” Id. at 346 n.1. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907144 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
STAT. § 806.06(5) states that “[n]otice of entry of judgment or order must be given within 21 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422189 - 2021-09-08
STAT. § 806.06(5) states that “[n]otice of entry of judgment or order must be given within 21 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422189 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
to Meenen on the final prong. See State v. Payano, 2009 WI 86, ¶¶63, 68 n.14, 80, 320 Wis. 2d 348, 768
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58835 - 2014-09-15
to Meenen on the final prong. See State v. Payano, 2009 WI 86, ¶¶63, 68 n.14, 80, 320 Wis. 2d 348, 768
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58835 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel was not ineffective for the lack of objection. See State v. Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d 721, 747 n.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
counsel was not ineffective for the lack of objection. See State v. Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d 721, 747 n.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95802 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 2d 774, 777 n.1, 456 N.W.2d 600 (1990). ¶10 Before admitting evidence of prior untruthful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36843 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 774, 777 n.1, 456 N.W.2d 600 (1990). ¶10 Before admitting evidence of prior untruthful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
that is “malicious, willful and intentional.’” Id., 228 Wis. 2d 90 n.8, 596 N.W.2d at 422 n.8 (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
that is “malicious, willful and intentional.’” Id., 228 Wis. 2d 90 n.8, 596 N.W.2d at 422 n.8 (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
forfeited the right to counsel.[2] Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d at 756 n.18. ¶13 However, even in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41864 - 2009-10-05
forfeited the right to counsel.[2] Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d at 756 n.18. ¶13 However, even in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41864 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
Susan K. Schey v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
is whether the act is discretionary or ministerial. See Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 10 n.6, 546 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14778 - 2017-09-21
is whether the act is discretionary or ministerial. See Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 10 n.6, 546 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14778 - 2017-09-21