Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30141 - 30150 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30141 - 30150 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
as other acts at separate trials on the other counts. The trial court described Pratt’s case as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134783 - 2015-02-10
as other acts at separate trials on the other counts. The trial court described Pratt’s case as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134783 - 2015-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
: (1) erroneously summarized the trial court’s original decision; (2) cited cases that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38825 - 2009-08-03
: (1) erroneously summarized the trial court’s original decision; (2) cited cases that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38825 - 2009-08-03
COURT OF APPEALS
that if this case were to proceed and it were to result in a conviction, the Court of Appeals would find my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82078 - 2012-05-08
that if this case were to proceed and it were to result in a conviction, the Court of Appeals would find my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82078 - 2012-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 5, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36378 - 2009-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 5, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36378 - 2009-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 16, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34881 - 2008-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 16, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34881 - 2008-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the circuit court erred by dismissing his case with prejudice and by denying him leave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109300 - 2014-03-19
contends that the circuit court erred by dismissing his case with prejudice and by denying him leave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109300 - 2014-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, the supreme court did not reverse the TPR order. It applied the harmless error analysis to the case, holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35018 - 2008-12-29
, the supreme court did not reverse the TPR order. It applied the harmless error analysis to the case, holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35018 - 2008-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions in this case since 2002. Jones does not assert that he ever notified the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89014 - 2012-11-05
postconviction motions in this case since 2002. Jones does not assert that he ever notified the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89014 - 2012-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 6, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100352 - 2013-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 6, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100352 - 2013-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, and facing a pending paternity action in another case. The trial court could reasonably conclude that Wade’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36017 - 2009-03-31
, and facing a pending paternity action in another case. The trial court could reasonably conclude that Wade’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36017 - 2009-03-31