Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30141 - 30150 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 30141 - 30150 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773312 - 2024-03-13
a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773312 - 2024-03-13
Ronald E. Patten v. David H. Schwarz
. There is no evidence in the record that the directive was in effect at the time of Patten’s revocation more than three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13106 - 2005-03-31
. There is no evidence in the record that the directive was in effect at the time of Patten’s revocation more than three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Hoefs
and reject probation, noting that Hoefs had a lengthy record and was on probation at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8223 - 2017-09-19
and reject probation, noting that Hoefs had a lengthy record and was on probation at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8223 - 2017-09-19
B&W Properties v. Jacqueline Omeziri
will decide this appeal on the basis of the record and the appellant’s brief.” B&W was also advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4081 - 2005-03-31
will decide this appeal on the basis of the record and the appellant’s brief.” B&W was also advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061968 - 2026-01-14
to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061968 - 2026-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237780 - 2019-03-20
of the briefs and record. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237780 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
State v. Rowlland R. Jackson
). 2 The record does not contain a hearing transcript, and neither the appellant's pro se brief nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8840 - 2017-09-19
). 2 The record does not contain a hearing transcript, and neither the appellant's pro se brief nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8840 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP844-NM 2 and an independent review of record, I conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384914 - 2021-07-08
. No. 2020AP844-NM 2 and an independent review of record, I conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384914 - 2021-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566558 - 2022-09-20
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566558 - 2022-09-20