Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30141 - 30150 of 58250 for speedy trial.
Search results 30141 - 30150 of 58250 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19
State v. John C. Jackson
that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress because the officer who found the cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13455 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress because the officer who found the cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13455 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
that the trial court erred when it concluded that the arresting officer had probable cause to request him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
that the trial court erred when it concluded that the arresting officer had probable cause to request him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
State v. Brian C. Miller
within 1000 feet of a park as a repeat offender. He argues that the trial court improperly restricted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14893 - 2005-03-31
within 1000 feet of a park as a repeat offender. He argues that the trial court improperly restricted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14893 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Angela M.W. v. Timothy E.D.
doctrine to Angela’s claim because the parties did not afford the trial court the opportunity to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13878 - 2014-09-15
doctrine to Angela’s claim because the parties did not afford the trial court the opportunity to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13878 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and (5) whether trial counsel was ineffective. 3 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146155 - 2017-09-21
; and (5) whether trial counsel was ineffective. 3 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146155 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 I. ¶2 The circuit court tried this case without a jury. See WIS. STAT. § 799.21 (trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84917 - 2014-09-15
2 I. ¶2 The circuit court tried this case without a jury. See WIS. STAT. § 799.21 (trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84917 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 30, 1994). Moore filed a response in which he challenged the effectiveness of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28958 - 2014-09-15
. 30, 1994). Moore filed a response in which he challenged the effectiveness of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28958 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
from the trial court’s order determining that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19
from the trial court’s order determining that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to pay child support in 2001 through 2003. At trial, he asserted the affirmative defense that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34342 - 2014-09-15
to pay child support in 2001 through 2003. At trial, he asserted the affirmative defense that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34342 - 2014-09-15