Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30171 - 30180 of 62799 for child support.
Search results 30171 - 30180 of 62799 for child support.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the evidence to support the jury verdicts, a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, or a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673832 - 2023-07-05
of the evidence to support the jury verdicts, a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, or a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673832 - 2023-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
upon proper legal standards.” Id. (citation omitted). If substantial evidence supports the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29734 - 2007-07-17
upon proper legal standards.” Id. (citation omitted). If substantial evidence supports the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29734 - 2007-07-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
to establish the evidentiary facts necessary to support its claim. Consequently, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58803 - 2014-09-15
to establish the evidentiary facts necessary to support its claim. Consequently, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58803 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to support it, the assessor acted according to statute, and the taxpayer did not rebut the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45178 - 2010-02-28
to support it, the assessor acted according to statute, and the taxpayer did not rebut the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45178 - 2010-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is missing from the appellate record, the appellate court assumes that the missing transcript would support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846891 - 2024-09-06
is missing from the appellate record, the appellate court assumes that the missing transcript would support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846891 - 2024-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6) (2007-08).[1] Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40021 - 2009-08-26
are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6) (2007-08).[1] Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40021 - 2009-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that there was insufficient evidence to support Mitton’s convictions. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602068 - 2022-12-21
be arguable merit to a claim that there was insufficient evidence to support Mitton’s convictions. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602068 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supports the verdicts against him. We decline to consider this argument as it is insufficiently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21
supports the verdicts against him. We decline to consider this argument as it is insufficiently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gloria J. Baker
to support the conviction. We conclude the evidence is sufficient and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2797 - 2017-09-19
to support the conviction. We conclude the evidence is sufficient and we therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2797 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the officer completed writing the warning citation, the record supports the circuit court’s finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98495 - 2014-09-15
the officer completed writing the warning citation, the record supports the circuit court’s finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98495 - 2014-09-15