Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30191 - 30200 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30191 - 30200 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or sentencing, or to the circuit court’s decision denying Larry’s postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152829 - 2017-09-21
or sentencing, or to the circuit court’s decision denying Larry’s postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152829 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
but consecutive to the sentence in the Kenosha County case. McGraw filed a pro se motion seeking to vacate DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503822 - 2022-04-06
but consecutive to the sentence in the Kenosha County case. McGraw filed a pro se motion seeking to vacate DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503822 - 2022-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
the City with written notice of her appeals. Consequently, the City filed a motion to dismiss Hall’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89798 - 2012-12-03
the City with written notice of her appeals. Consequently, the City filed a motion to dismiss Hall’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89798 - 2012-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Melvin D. Parker, Jr.
trial right was violated, and whether the trial court properly decided his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4522 - 2017-09-19
trial right was violated, and whether the trial court properly decided his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4522 - 2017-09-19
Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
. Stat. § 348.15(3)(c). Sylvia’s argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5599 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 348.15(3)(c). Sylvia’s argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5599 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald A. Washington
by the police, and that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7078 - 2005-03-31
by the police, and that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7078 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it denied her motion to suppress. In particular, Raue argues that she was unlawfully detained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67329 - 2014-09-15
it denied her motion to suppress. In particular, Raue argues that she was unlawfully detained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67329 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Stahl
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(a) (“the court upon its own motion … may enlarge or reduce the time prescribed by these rules or court order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400508 - 2021-07-28
)(a) (“the court upon its own motion … may enlarge or reduce the time prescribed by these rules or court order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400508 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
court’s order of February 18, 2004, denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s January 9, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
court’s order of February 18, 2004, denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s January 9, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20