Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis. 2d 169, 694 N.W.2d 344
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33381 - 2008-07-14
a question of law de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis. 2d 169, 694 N.W.2d 344
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33381 - 2008-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
sentenced on inaccurate information is reviewed de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶10 The State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144252 - 2015-07-13
sentenced on inaccurate information is reviewed de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶10 The State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144252 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
WI App 31
is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶4 We also review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650417 - 2023-07-12
is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶4 We also review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650417 - 2023-07-12
City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
requires us to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6810 - 2005-03-31
requires us to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6810 - 2005-03-31
Zois Dertis v. Dimitrios Panagiotaras
decide de novo whether Dertis’s claim should have been brought as a shareholder’s derivative action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4295 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo whether Dertis’s claim should have been brought as a shareholder’s derivative action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4295 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. Paige K.B. ex rel. Peterson v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63179 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. Paige K.B. ex rel. Peterson v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tammy F.
of statutory construction and interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19
of statutory construction and interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kris A. Westberg
facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5572 - 2017-09-19
facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5572 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gary L. Everts
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
Mike Brolin v. Kim Bauers
of retaliation in making its factual findings. We review Bauers’ first contention de novo because it alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2006-02-22
of retaliation in making its factual findings. We review Bauers’ first contention de novo because it alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2006-02-22