Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 29942 for des.

Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6020 - 2013-04-29

[PDF] 09-08-2021 Order Granting Amicus Motions
de la Frontera, The League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Cindy Fallona, Lauren Stephenson, Rebecca
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/090821ordergrantamicusmotions.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] November Published Orders
Pont de Nemours and Company 2006AP002753 CR 2007 WI App 240 State v. Jonathan J. Hubbard 2006AP002771
/ca/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31035 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Linda A. Clifford
. ¶2 On summary judgment, we read UIM provisions de novo and must affirm the trial court if Auto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15542 - 2017-09-21

Kathleen E. Dobrznski and * v. Little Black Mutual Insurance Company
as the trial court. Our review is therefore de novo. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146 Wis.2d 662, 667
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10250 - 2005-03-31

Mona Park-Childs v. Mrotek's, Inc.
of law that we review de novo. See Yauger v. Skiing Enterprises, Inc., 206 Wis.2d 76, 79, 557 N.W.2d 60
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12936 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135480 - 2015-02-19

[PDF] State v. Lester H. Cook
to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. Cook does
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10223 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Karen M. Boedecker
review de novo. State v. Holmes, 106 Wis. 2d 31, 41 n.7, 315 N.W.2d 703, 708 n.7 (1982). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4973 - 2017-09-19

State v. Louis E. Fettes
de novo. State v. Edgeberg, 188 Wis. 2d 339, 344-45, 524 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3039 - 2005-03-31