Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. ¶5 Pitt subsequently filed a motion for postconviction relief. In it, he sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717585 - 2023-10-25
of extended supervision. ¶5 Pitt subsequently filed a motion for postconviction relief. In it, he sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717585 - 2023-10-25
State v. James Welch
, and therefore did not need to be supported by probable cause; and the use of the dog did not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5123 - 2005-03-31
, and therefore did not need to be supported by probable cause; and the use of the dog did not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5123 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. Baldwin appealed his convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191650 - 2017-09-21
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. Baldwin appealed his convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191650 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement, to be followed by four years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
confinement, to be followed by four years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
State v. Jared J.
only three and one-half months remained on the dispositional order and determined that it could extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31
only three and one-half months remained on the dispositional order and determined that it could extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in case No. 2010CF5855, is thirty months’ initial confinement and thirty-six months’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101937 - 2013-09-16
in case No. 2010CF5855, is thirty months’ initial confinement and thirty-six months’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101937 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Ruiz
. No. 2004AP886-CR 3 year periods of confinement and extended supervision. After the summary rejection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2004AP886-CR 3 year periods of confinement and extended supervision. After the summary rejection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concurrently, with two years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. Soles’ lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104150 - 2017-09-21
concurrently, with two years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. Soles’ lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104150 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel E.
that the termination order is invalid because he was not properly notified of a request to extend a CHIPS[1] order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16063 - 2005-03-31
that the termination order is invalid because he was not properly notified of a request to extend a CHIPS[1] order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and two years of extended supervision. For the witness intimidation count, the trial court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140327 - 2017-09-21
and two years of extended supervision. For the witness intimidation count, the trial court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140327 - 2017-09-21