Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 69479 for had.
Search results 3021 - 3030 of 69479 for had.
State v. David S. Rhodes
and several acquaintances, including King, Brenda Pettway, Yolanda Means, and Clifton Chavas had been together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8436 - 2005-03-31
and several acquaintances, including King, Brenda Pettway, Yolanda Means, and Clifton Chavas had been together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. Madsen
determine Madsen was not denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel had a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5398 - 2017-09-19
determine Madsen was not denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel had a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5398 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Washington
of the investigating drug agents. As a result, Washington had to interrupt the proceedings and personally direct his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9770 - 2017-09-19
of the investigating drug agents. As a result, Washington had to interrupt the proceedings and personally direct his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9770 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert M. Madsen
effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel had a reasonable strategic reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5398 - 2005-03-31
effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel had a reasonable strategic reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5398 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged that the court had jurisdiction over the children under Wis. Stat. § 48.13(10) and (10m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32775 - 2005-03-31
alleged that the court had jurisdiction over the children under Wis. Stat. § 48.13(10) and (10m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32775 - 2005-03-31
State v. David M. Murrell
together with co-defendant Carl Owens (a/k/a “Buck”). A witness, Jermaine Burrage, had identified Murrell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31
together with co-defendant Carl Owens (a/k/a “Buck”). A witness, Jermaine Burrage, had identified Murrell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David M. Murrell
”) was charged and tried together with co-defendant Carl Owens (a/k/a “Buck”). A witness, Jermaine Burrage, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21
”) was charged and tried together with co-defendant Carl Owens (a/k/a “Buck”). A witness, Jermaine Burrage, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Tucker would admit that he had gotten into an argument with King outside his home; his wife called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211695 - 2018-04-24
, Tucker would admit that he had gotten into an argument with King outside his home; his wife called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211695 - 2018-04-24
State v. Arthur Richard Edwards
., the dispatcher contacted Edwards and informed him that his daughter had called for him and requested that he come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11371 - 2005-03-31
., the dispatcher contacted Edwards and informed him that his daughter had called for him and requested that he come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Ropicky advised Bray that he had stopped Bray’s vehicle for speeding. Sergeant Ropicky informed Bray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28
Ropicky advised Bray that he had stopped Bray’s vehicle for speeding. Sergeant Ropicky informed Bray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28