Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30201 - 30210 of 37914 for d's.
Search results 30201 - 30210 of 37914 for d's.
State v. Mark R. Norlander
into any vehicle, building, room or secluded place is guilty of a Class D felony: (1) Having sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-05-31
into any vehicle, building, room or secluded place is guilty of a Class D felony: (1) Having sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-05-31
State v. Cori E. Jeffers
with battery to an officer, a Class D felony, contrary to § 940.20(2), Stats., and resisting an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12182 - 2005-03-31
with battery to an officer, a Class D felony, contrary to § 940.20(2), Stats., and resisting an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12182 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in home-making and child care services. Wis. Stat. § 767.61(3)(a), (b), and (d). ¶9 Scott argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36288 - 2009-04-27
in home-making and child care services. Wis. Stat. § 767.61(3)(a), (b), and (d). ¶9 Scott argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36288 - 2009-04-27
State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
sentence did not violate the double jeopardy clauses. We acknowledge that “[d]ouble jeopardy protections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2011-05-18
sentence did not violate the double jeopardy clauses. We acknowledge that “[d]ouble jeopardy protections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2011-05-18
State v. Trenton McAdoo
a single basis for his request: “[D]efendant says he was unduly pressured by his family to plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31
a single basis for his request: “[D]efendant says he was unduly pressured by his family to plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was prejudicial. See id. at 697. D. Real Controversy ¶26 Valiquette argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105835 - 2010-04-01
performance was prejudicial. See id. at 697. D. Real Controversy ¶26 Valiquette argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105835 - 2010-04-01
State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
to suppress evidence. See Wis. Stat. § 974.05(1)(d)2 (providing that State may appeal an order suppressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31
to suppress evidence. See Wis. Stat. § 974.05(1)(d)2 (providing that State may appeal an order suppressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lisa L. Lappley
to take the test in question.” § 343.305(9)(d). ¶9 Lappley does not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19776 - 2005-09-28
to take the test in question.” § 343.305(9)(d). ¶9 Lappley does not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19776 - 2005-09-28
State v. John B. Young
to take the test in question.” Sec. 343.305(9)(d). ¶8 Young argues that because his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4402 - 2006-08-29
to take the test in question.” Sec. 343.305(9)(d). ¶8 Young argues that because his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4402 - 2006-08-29
2010 WI APP 139
provide[d]” a pamphlet entitled “The Rights of Landowners under Wisconsin Eminent Domain Law,” and were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
provide[d]” a pamphlet entitled “The Rights of Landowners under Wisconsin Eminent Domain Law,” and were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21