Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30201 - 30210 of 65932 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 30201 - 30210 of 65932 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Ruven Seibert
claim of error.[1] Also, the record suggests Seibert offered the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31
claim of error.[1] Also, the record suggests Seibert offered the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143545 - 2015-06-30
of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143545 - 2015-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Robert Garel
denied his postconviction motion for sentence credit. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13659 - 2017-09-21
denied his postconviction motion for sentence credit. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13659 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion, a circuit court is to specify, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
sentencing discretion, a circuit court is to specify, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
[PDF]
Yusef L. Williams v. Matthew J. Frank
director did not indicate in the record why he prosecuted the offense as a major, rather than minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6591 - 2017-09-19
director did not indicate in the record why he prosecuted the offense as a major, rather than minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6591 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218679 - 2018-09-04
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218679 - 2018-09-04
CA Blank Order
an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122247 - 2014-09-23
an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122247 - 2014-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6) (2007-08).[1] Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40021 - 2009-08-26
are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6) (2007-08).[1] Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40021 - 2009-08-26
State v. Michael J. Muetz
immediately following the verdict. Pointing to Muetz’s lengthy record—which included nine drunk-driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12788 - 2005-03-31
immediately following the verdict. Pointing to Muetz’s lengthy record—which included nine drunk-driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12788 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barry L. Ball v. Matthew Frank
review. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 Our certiorari review is limited to the record created before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21513 - 2017-09-21
review. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 Our certiorari review is limited to the record created before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21513 - 2017-09-21