Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30201 - 30210 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 30201 - 30210 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Donald Boeshaar
the prejudice test, Boeshaar must show that, but for defense counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12310 - 2017-09-21
the prejudice test, Boeshaar must show that, but for defense counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12310 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and his two friends. So he fails on the first [aspect of the test for “newly discovered evidence”]. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96325 - 2013-05-06
, and his two friends. So he fails on the first [aspect of the test for “newly discovered evidence”]. II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96325 - 2013-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57606 - 2010-12-08
reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57606 - 2010-12-08
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Dale R. Mlejnek
acted reasonably in detaining a person, we apply an objective test which considers whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14975 - 2017-09-21
acted reasonably in detaining a person, we apply an objective test which considers whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The test is not whether the lawyer should expect the argument to prevail. See SCR 20:3.1, cmt. (action
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500487 - 2022-03-29
). The test is not whether the lawyer should expect the argument to prevail. See SCR 20:3.1, cmt. (action
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500487 - 2022-03-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Testing, Inc., 2009 WI App 62, ¶25, 318 Wis. 2d 148, 769 N.W.2d 82 (observing that “we will not abandon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
Testing, Inc., 2009 WI App 62, ¶25, 318 Wis. 2d 148, 769 N.W.2d 82 (observing that “we will not abandon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017718 - 2025-09-30
State v. Nicholaas P.J. Ligtenberg
, ¶¶12-13, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 668 N.W.2d 810. The examining court tests whether the defendant validly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5919 - 2005-03-31
, ¶¶12-13, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 668 N.W.2d 810. The examining court tests whether the defendant validly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5919 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Collins asked him to step out of the truck to perform field sobriety tests. Bennett got out and claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463895 - 2021-12-22
, Collins asked him to step out of the truck to perform field sobriety tests. Bennett got out and claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463895 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that this deficient performance prejudiced him. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175383 - 2017-09-21
and that this deficient performance prejudiced him. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175383 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Arlandis Issac v. Gerald A. Berge
to incite a riot. On certiorari review, we apply the substantial evidence test, that is, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19753 - 2017-09-21
to incite a riot. On certiorari review, we apply the substantial evidence test, that is, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19753 - 2017-09-21