Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30211 - 30220 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30211 - 30220 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
the case to the trial court for resentencing. BACKGROUND ¶2 Following a jury trial, Jefferson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
the case to the trial court for resentencing. BACKGROUND ¶2 Following a jury trial, Jefferson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
of the facts of this case. ¶18 Wisconsin Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(a) states that, if this court finds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108981 - 2014-03-12
of the facts of this case. ¶18 Wisconsin Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(a) states that, if this court finds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108981 - 2014-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. At the close of Whiteaker’s case, the circuit court made several findings of what it deemed “uncontested fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94299 - 2013-03-18
. At the close of Whiteaker’s case, the circuit court made several findings of what it deemed “uncontested fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94299 - 2013-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 22, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29105 - 2007-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 22, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29105 - 2007-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33537 - 2008-09-29
. ¶5 The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33537 - 2008-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony from a family case manager that allowed the trial court to make a finding that there was a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114109 - 2014-06-09
testimony from a family case manager that allowed the trial court to make a finding that there was a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114109 - 2014-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of cases listed by the Berry court as inadmissible. We review admissibility of evidence for an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29612 - 2007-07-04
of cases listed by the Berry court as inadmissible. We review admissibility of evidence for an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29612 - 2007-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61921 - 2011-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61921 - 2011-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
for an award of attorneys’ fees in this case. This court agrees that Ossoinik’s claim for attorneys’ fees must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134596 - 2015-02-09
for an award of attorneys’ fees in this case. This court agrees that Ossoinik’s claim for attorneys’ fees must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134596 - 2015-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
case, a court must first consider the four elements of negligence. Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77516 - 2010-08-24
case, a court must first consider the four elements of negligence. Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77516 - 2010-08-24